Keywords
young infants, clinical signs, severe illness requiring hospitalization, Pakistan, community
-
Views
-
Downloads
How to cite this article
Shahid S, Tikmani SS, Brown N et al. Young infant clinical signs study, Pakistan: a data note [version 1; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. Gates Open Res 2021, 5:122 (https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13317.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Export Citation
Sciwheel
EndNote
Ref. Manager
Bibtex
ProCite
Sente
▬
✚
Data Note
Young infant clinical signs study, Pakistan: a data note
[version 1; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 12 Aug 2021
Abstract
Corresponding author:
Muhammad Imran Nisar
Competing interests:
No competing interests were disclosed.
Grant information:
This study was funded jointly by WHO, Boston University (through a Cooperative Agreement between Boston University and the Office of Health and Nutrition of the United States Agency for International Development; GHS-A-00-03-00020-00) and Save the Children—US through a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for the Saving Newborn Lives Programme [OPP1033799]. None of the funding bodies had any role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Copyright:
© 2021 Shahid S et al.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to cite: Shahid S, Tikmani SS, Brown N et al. Young infant clinical signs study, Pakistan: a data note [version 1; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. Gates Open Res 2021, 5:122 (https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13317.1)
First published: 12 Aug 2021, 5:122 (https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13317.1)
Latest published: 12 Aug 2021, 5:122 (https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13317.1)
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Introduction
In 2015, around 45% of all under-five mortality occurred in the first month of life particularly in low- and middle-income countries1. Majority of neonatal deaths occur due to infections; thus, it is important to identify sick infants needing urgent referral and hospitalization. The Young Infant Clinical Signs Study (YICSS) is a multi-country study conducted across six low- and middle-income countries (Bangladesh, Bolivia, Ghana, India, South Africa, and Pakistan) at seven sites. The study determined predictive values of various clinical signs and symptoms which can be used by primary healthcare workers to identify infants with severe illness requiring hospitalization as compared to an expert pediatrician diagnosis2. The study enrolled infants in two age groups: 3,177 infants in the 0–6 days age group and 5,712 infants in the 7–59 days age group. Out of the 31 signs and symptoms recorded by the community health workers, 12 identified severe illness in the first week of life and the algorithm was further reduced to seven key predictors of disease severity. The findings of this study formed the basis for updating the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines. Since its conception, the World Health Organisation (WHO) IMCI algorithm has been used in other major community-based studies. A multicenter observational cohort study called Aetiology of Neonatal Infection in South Asia (ANISA) and another randomised, open label, equivalence trial Simplified Antibiotic Therapy Trial (SATT) were both based on the IMCI seven-sign algorithm and proved to be important steps in understanding the infectious etiology behind neonatal possible serious bacterial infections and antibiotic regimens that can be given in case referral is not possible3,4.
The datasets presented in this paper are from the site-specific study conducted by the Aga Khan University in Karachi, Pakistan. The study aimed to validate clinical signs and symptoms in Pakistani infants in order to identify severe illness and predict hospital admissions. It was the largest site-specific cohort in the YICSS. The data is more representative of the study population since it is collected from community-based referral to primary healthcare centers. The data collection for the primary study occurred from 2003-2004. We believe these site-specific results remain relevant for similar low-and-middle-income settings. The dataset can be used by researchers to replicate the analysis or update systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
Materials and methods
Data description
The dataset includes 2950 observations from 1,633 infants aged 0-6 days, 817 infants aged 7-27 days and 500 infants aged 28-59 days. Infants were enrolled from September 2003 to November 2004. There are five files which are uploaded: “YICSS Dataset Version 2.xslx”, “YIS codebook Version 2.xls”, “Form A.pdf”, “Form B.pdf” and “Form C.pdf” available for download5. There is a total of 253 fields in the “YIS Dataset Version 2.xlsx”. “Form A.pdf”, “Form B.pdf” and “Form C.pdf” are the study tools that were used to collect this data. A codebook “YIS codebook Version 2. xslx” gives information on individual variables.
Data collection
The study was conducted in two peri-urban sites, Rehri Goth and Ibrahim Hyderi and an urban squatter settlement, Bilal Colony in Karachi, Pakistan. Both the peri-urban sites had Primary Healthcare Centers (PHC) run by the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH). All infants aged less than 60 days who were either self-referred to our center or referred by Community Health Workers (CHW) during community surveillance were first screened by a trained LHV (Lady Health Visitor) (Study Person A) after determining eligibility and taking informed consent from the parent/guardian. Form A included a questionnaire on the socio-demographic details and clinical signs which were recorded by the LHV. The infants were then referred to an experienced pediatrician (Study person B) who was blinded to the assessment of the LHV. The pediatrician determined the need for immediate referral of the infants to a tertiary care hospital, the National Institute of Child Health (NICH), based on their clinical presentation. Infant pulse and oximetry were also performed. Form B collected information of the expert paediatrician assessment and Form C described the final clinical diagnoses at the end of hospitalisation. A detailed description of the methodology has been published previously2,6.
Data entry and management
All the forms were first checked for completion and correctness. Data was then double entered into an Epi-Data database (V.2.1, Epidata Association, Odense Denmark). Data cleaning and consistency checks were performed at the data coordination centre in Melbourne, Australia. The quality of data received from study sites was also monitored.
Statistical methods
Following the methodology of the primary paper, we replicated the analysis for 0-6-day age group in Pakistani infants2. We determined a simple association between each of the clinical signs and symptoms and the study outcome (i.e., severe illness requiring urgent referral, as confirmed by paediatrician diagnosis) using sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We developed multiple logistic regression models to determine predictors of urgent referral. We used backward selection to identify predictors with an OR of at least 2 and 95% confidence interval excluding 1. Signs were omitted when the corresponding p-value in the multivariable model was greater than 0·05 or the adjusted OR fell below 2 and thus was considered unlikely to have major prognostic value. A further reduction of the list of signs was then made based on their prevalence and clinical judgement grounds, omitting signs that were rarely reported. All analysis was performed using Stata version 9.2 software.
Data availability
Underlying data
Mendeley Data: YICSS Pakistan site dataset. https://doi.org/10.17632/3pgb37wck4.25.
This project contains the following underlying data:
Extended data
Mendeley Data: YICSS Pakistan site dataset. https://doi.org/10.17632/3pgb37wck4.25.
This project contains the following extended data:
1. Form A.pdf (Health worker assessment)
2. Form B.pdf (Expert Pediatrician Assessment)
3. Form C.pdf (Final clinical diagnoses at the end of hospitalization)
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
Consent
Written informed consent for publication of the participants’ details was obtained from the parent or legal guardian of the child.
Download
Export To
metrics
| Views | Downloads | |
|---|---|---|
| Gates Open Research | - | - |
|
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Shahid S, Tikmani SS, Brown N et al. Young infant clinical signs study, Pakistan: a data note [version 1; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. Gates Open Res 2021, 5:122 (https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13317.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations -
A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Competing Interests Policy
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests'
- Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper.
- You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors.
- You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student).
- You work at the same institute as any of the authors.
- You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission.
- You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published.
Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests'
- You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements.
- You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors.
- You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on.
Stay Updated
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Register with Gates Open Research
Already registered? Sign in
Comments on this article Comments (0)