Keywords
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, South Africa, behavioral sciences, HIV, men, nudge, behavioral economics
“Indlela - Behavioural Insights for Health” a behavioural science unit focused on improving health services in South Africa developed a pragmatic behavioural design framework called N-U-D-G-E. We used the nudgeathon approach to combine our technical expertise with stakeholder knowledge to apply this framework and rapidly co-create behavioural solutions designed to improve PrEP uptake and persistence amongst gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM) in South Africa. Over two days we took 26 stakeholders divided into five teams through the framework and identified 602 solutions which were prioritized into two ideas per team and then pitched to an expert panel. This approach uncovered several high-potential, novel light-touch solutions to some of the challenges hindering PrEP delivery to gay men and other MSM in South Africa. This format is an effective way to engage stakeholders, including policy makers, in the process of both identifying behavioural barriers to optimal health decision making as well as creating novel solutions that can be tested.
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, South Africa, behavioral sciences, HIV, men, nudge, behavioral economics
“Indlela – Behavioral Insights for Better Health” (https://indlela.org), a novel behavioral science unit focused on improving health services and achieving better health outcomes in South Africa was established in 2019 (Thirumurthy et al., 2023). Primary goals of the unit are to build capacity in applying behavioral science in the public sector and to build the evidence base for behavioral solutions through rapid tests and dissemination. To support these goals, the team developed the NUDGE Handbook, a pragmatic behavioral design framework (Mandimika et al., 2023). Even with the NUDGE framework, it was challenging for key knowledge holders and experts (i.e., clients, health care providers, implementers, policy makers) to incorporate behavioral insights into their programs. It was equally challenging for behavioral scientists on the Indlela team to design solutions without the deep knowledge and lived experience of the stakeholders.
We developed a process that combined Indlela’s technical expertise and stakeholder knowledge to rapidly co-create behavioral solutions to address behavior change challenges and advance public health goals. We identified nudgeathons – used in other settings and for other behavioral change challenges – as a promising approach (Udall et al., 2019). A nudgeathon is a rapid, structured design process that leverages behavioral insights to generate potential interventions. Indlela designed and hosted our first nudgeathon in Johannesburg (March 2023) to identify opportunities to improve HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) service delivery for gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM) in South Africa.
In South Africa, gay men and other MSM bear a disproportionate HIV burden, with 30% prevalence (UNAIDS, 2023); in Eastern and Southern Africa more than 40% of new infections are associated with vulnerable population groups (including MSM) and their partners (UNAIDS, 2023). In 2016 South Africa started offering PrEP to populations at increased risk of HIV acquisition and now has one of the largest populations of PrEP initiators (UNAIDS, 2023). However, both uptake (PrEP initiation) and persistence (remaining on PrEP) are lower than optimal given the expected benefits for this population in South Africa. In addition to significant structural barriers to PrEP uptake and persistence, prior research also points to important behavioral barriers and opportunities to mitigate structural barriers through behavioral interventions (Paladhi et al., 2022).
To capture these potential solutions to increase PrEP uptake and persistence amongst gay men and other MSM, we designed and conducted a two-day nudgeathon in partnership with 26 diverse key stakeholders implementing PrEP programming in South Africa, including health care providers, health program implementers, policy makers and government officials. Stakeholders were purposively assigned to one of 5 teams; all teams included trained behavioral scientists who helped facilitate the process. Our nudgeathon process was informed by the 7-stage nudgeathon model (Udall et al., 2019), Indlela’s NUDGE framework (Mandimika et al., 2023), and the UK Behavioral Insights Team’s TESTS framework (The Behavioural Insights Team, 2022).
Over two consecutive days (15–16 March 2023), we led teams through the following activities:
Call to action: A prominent HIV scientist, clinician and activist opened the event by outlining the critical role of HIV PrEP in achieving epidemic control and the need for novel solutions for the highest-burden populations.
Narrow the target behavior: Teams were allocated one of two target statements: 1) Increase PrEP initiation, or 2) Increase persistence on PrEP. Policy-responsive target statements were developed in advance by the Indlela team based on existing literature. Target statements narrowed the focus of the nudgeathon to a specific population: gay men and other MSM.
Understand the context: Following an overview of current South African PrEP guidelines, participants listened to audio-recorded statements (voiced by Indlela team members) and reviewed printed quotations taken from focus group discussions with South African gay men and other MSM. This immersive experience brought PrEP client perspectives to the center of our intervention design process. Next, teams built user journey maps for hypothetical PrEP clients based on their own expertise and the provided inputs. User journey maps were refined following reflections from an expert panel of South African clinicians about the implementation of PrEP guidelines at healthcare facilities.
Discover behavioral insights: Building on the prior activities, teams identified behavioral barriers that would influence PrEP uptake or persistence. The COM-B model (Michie et al., 2011) informed this discovery process, guiding identification, and prioritization of barriers.
Generate solutions: This ideation phase drew on multiple brainstorming strategies from the design thinking toolkit to identify novel solutions that addressed specific barriers discovered in the previous step. We applied open road (no constraints), subtraction (take away to make better) (Klotz, 2021), and analogy (how would another company do this?) strategies. We also used the EAST (“Easy, Attractive, Social Timely”) framework (Service et al., 2015). After four rounds of brainstorming, teams collectively captured 602 potential solutions. Each team then clustered and combined solutions, and selected two solutions to advance to early-stage prototyping.
Evaluate: Teams then prototyped and pitched two solutions to an expert panel including a representative from the national PrEP program and two PrEP implementing partner representatives. Using three evaluation criteria (impact, feasibility, and desirability), the evaluation committee selected three top ideas: 1) “Funnest sex tonight” which utilized social norms and the affect heuristic to promote event driven PrEP distribution and packaging; 2) “PrEP on the move” that aimed at reducing hassle factors by using local retailers as distribution points; and 3) “PrEP persistence” which focused on addressing present bias and leveraging personalization in an improved clinic experience.
To capitalize on all the insights and ideas that emerged in the nudgeathon, the Indlela team also captured all the brainstormed solutions in a database. Using a hybrid AI-supported (OpenAI, 2023) thematic analysis, we mapped the 602 ideas to 18 categories, which were in turn mapped to the EAST framework (see Table 1). For each category, a stylized exemplar solution was created to illustrate the category.
Our nudgeathon uncovered several high-potential, novel light-touch solutions to some of the challenges facing PrEP delivery targets for gay men and other MSM in South Africa. The robust engagement of implementing partners, practitioners and policy makers ensured that promising solutions could rapidly advance to higher-fidelity prototypes, pilot studies, or directly into practice. Several nudgeathon participants have reported using the outputs for programmatic changes to their PrEP programs in South Africa. We have made the nudgeathon results available online so that these data can serve as a repository for future solutions.
Running a nudgeathon with implementers and policy makers highlighted the critical role that behavioral insights can play in finding appropriate solutions to persistent challenges. Emphasizing the importance of human centered design and incorporating diverse voices in the design process increased the potential for the emerging solutions to be relevant, responsive, and effective. We believe that the nudgeathon is an effective format for engaging with implementers grappling with shared programmatic barriers, and look forward to facilitating additional sessions focused on other barriers in the future.
This meeting was programmatic in nature, participation was voluntary, and as no individual level data pertaining to the individual was gathered it was not classified as human subjects research and neither written consent nor ethical approval were required. This is consistent with our institutional ethics guidelines (University of Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee & Boston University Medical Campus Institutional Review Board).
The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s). Publication in Gates Open Research does not imply endorsement by the Gates Foundation.
Supplemental information to “Improving pre-exposure prophylaxis service delivery to gay men and other men who have sex with men in South Africa: Generating novel insights with a nudgeathon” can be found on Figshare (www.figshare.com). The project contains the following underlying information:
Supplemental file 1 – Nudgeathon Report. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26517124 (Indlela - Behavioural Insights for Health, 2024a)
Supplemental file 2 – Nudgeathon Solutions. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26517133 (Indlela - Behavioural Insights for Health, 2024b)
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).
LL, CCM and AB were responsible for the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors participated in the review and categorization of the data. All authors provided input and approved the final version of the manuscript.
We would like to thank the members of the Indlela team that helped organize and facilitate the nudgeathon, specifically William Magolego, Jacqui Miot, Neo Ndlovu, Laura Schmucker, Harsha Thirumurthy, and Lungi Vezi. We would like to thank the clients and providers that helped inform the participants of the nudgeathon, the participants and the expert panel.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
Gates Open Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the rationale for the Open Letter provided in sufficient detail?
Yes
Does the article adequately reference differing views and opinions?
Yes
Are all factual statements correct, and are statements and arguments made adequately supported by citations?
Yes
Is the Open Letter written in accessible language?
Yes
Where applicable, are recommendations and next steps explained clearly for others to follow?
Yes
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: HIV prevention, implementation research, clinical trials, digital interventions, epidemiology, pre-exposure prophylaxis, men who have sex with men
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | |
---|---|
1 | |
Version 1 07 Oct 24 |
read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Register with Gates Open Research
Already registered? Sign in
If you are a previous or current Gates grant holder, sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from Gates Open Research.
We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to Gates Open Research
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)