DHS                Demography and Health Survey

DRC                Democratic Republic of Congo

EA                   Enumeration Area

FP                    Family Planning

GIS                  Geographic Information System

GPS                 Global Positioning System

LARC               Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive

LMIC               Low- and Middle-Income Country

PMA2020         Performance, Monitoring, and Accountability

PPS                   Probability Proportional to Size

RE                     Resident Enumerator

SDP                   Service Delivery Point

SPA                   Service Provision Assessment

UTM                 Universal Transverse Mercator

The FP2020 goal of “expanding access to family planning information, services, and supplies to an additional 120 million women and girls in the world’s poorest countries by 2020”, has been a driving force in the family planning community in recent years ¹ . Access is usually affected by a range of both service delivery points and client characteristics ² . It has been widely discussed in literature that spatial access has a direct effect on health service utilization ^{3– 10} .

In the context of family planning, spatial access is defined as the extent to which family planning service delivery and supply points are located so that a large proportion of the target population can reach them with an acceptable level of effort ¹¹ . Researchers have applied various methods to measure spatial access ^{2, 4, 12– 14} . Some have measured spatial access as an administrative indicator which is defined as the healthcare provider to population ratio within specific administrative units or other geographic areas ^{15– 17} . This approach fails to recognize the fact that administrative boundaries are rarely the same as health system boundaries. It also does not take into account differences in population characteristics or demographics within a particular administrative boundary. Distance-based measures (compared to other measures such as population to facility ratios) have been increasingly used in recent years to assess spatial access. This has been made possible due to advancements in geographic information system (GIS) technology and improved availability of geographic data ^{18– 20} . Although the proximity to a facility has been shown to have a significant role in health care utilization, meaningful measurement of this factor of accessibility remains challenging in the context of many low and middle-income countries ^{9, 21} .

Literature on the importance of spatial access indicates that there is no consensus regarding the impact of distance on modern contraceptive use. Many studies have observed that the farther an individual lives from a health facility, the less likely they are to use contraceptive or other health services in that facility ^{3, 12, 22– 25} . Where data is available, studies show that women who reside closer to facilities offering family planning (FP) services are more likely to use modern contraceptives. For example, Sultan et al. investigated service provision in rural Pakistan and found that women who lived within five kilometers of two community-based distributers were significantly more likely to adopt a modern method of contraception than women who lived farther than five kilometers ²⁵ .

Contrarily, some studies have shown that distance to a facility has no significant effect on modern contraceptive use among women. One publication ²⁶ observed the distance decay effect of family planning availability on modern contraceptive use among women in rural Bangladesh. Results from this study indicated that spatial access to selected facilities was not significantly correlated with contraceptive use ²⁶ . Additionally, Achana and colleagues found that there was no linear relationship between distance to the closest health facility and modern contraceptive use among women in Upper East Ghana ²⁷ .

A literature review on spatial access to contraceptives also indicated that researchers often test the theory of distance decay to observe any association between an increased distance of health facilities and health service utilization. In other words, scientists have often tested the hypothesis that the farther a woman lives from a facility, the less likely she is to use contraception. The opposite hypothesis: the closer a woman lives to a facility, the more likely she uses contraceptive services, has not been widely investigated.

Furthermore, most studies have assessed proximity to health facilities as a driving factor for modern contraceptive use, without considering institution-specific characteristics, such as availability and quality of services. Although physical access to contraceptive services is necessary, it is not a sufficient metric alone for assessing the relationship between spatial access and contraceptive use. Numerous studies have found that quality of FP services is a crucial factor in women’s uptake and continued use of family planning methods ^{28– 32} . Moreover, despite the relative importance of proximity to a facility as a measure of access in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), existing research is mostly aimed at evaluating access in rural areas ^{9, 31, 33, 34} . There has been limited research on spatial access in large urban areas in LMICs, such as Kinshasa.

This study aims to analyze the significance of proximity to family planning services, as well as service availability and quality of family planning services in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. We test the effect of living closer to a facility on likelihood of using modern contraceptives in Kinshasa. Using data from Performance, Monitoring, and Accountability 2020 (PMA2020) surveys in Kinshasa, the present analysis aims to answer the question if proximity of women to facilities with better availability, service quality, choice of contraceptive methods either affects their contraceptive use or unmet need for family planning services, in Kinshasa. Addressing this question has important consequences for program design in Kinshasa, since it may indicate that spatial proximity, while necessary, is not a sufficient determinant of FP service use. Evidence from this study would contribute to informing policies that address gaps in expanding access to modern contraceptives among women in Kinshasa.

Overall, 10936 women were interviewed over four rounds of data collection (response rate was more than 97% in each round). The mean age for women was 28 years old. Almost half of the women were married or currently in union (49.8%). More than three quarter of the women had secondary or more education ( Table 1).

Our findings show that living closer to an SDP is not a determinant of modern contraceptive use or having unmet need for FP services. This result was observed with data collected from all rounds of surveying (see Table 2– Table 5). Associations between distance to SDPs and changes in level of modern contraceptive use were insignificant (p>0.05).

Our analysis shows that, with increased distance to an SDP, the proportion of women using any modern contraceptive method does not decrease significantly. However, data collected from some rounds of surveying, illustrated a decrease in the percentage of women using a modern contraceptive method with an increase in distance from some SDPs. For example, in round 2 of PMA2020 in Kinshasa, the proportion of modern contraceptive users decreased from 21% to 16.3 %, when distance from an SDP that offered free services increased from 250m to 1000m. Additionally, in round three of data, the proportion of modern contraceptive users decreased from 23.1% to 18.4%, when distance from an SDP that provided at least 5 modern contraceptive methods was increased from 250m to 1000m. However, as stated previously, these decreases in modern contraceptive use were not statistically significant (p=0.718).

Similarly, our findings present no significant difference between the proportion of women with unmet need for family planning and distances of 250m, 500m, and 1000m from an SDP that offers free services, or 5 or more modern contraceptive methods. We expected to find a higher proportion of women with unmet need for family planning in buffer zones further away from SDPs with preferable characteristics. Analysis of data collected in round 3 of PMA2020 shows that the proportion of women with unmet need for family planning increased from 15.0% in buffer zones 250m from an SDP that provided at least five methods, to 18.2% in buffer zones 1000m from an SDPs that provided at least five methods.

We evaluated several additional FP metrics and SDP characteristics to verify if any additional factors could be a determinant for modern contraceptive methods use women.

SDPs that had at least three or more methods in stock or five or more methods in stock were used to measure the availability of reliable FP services. The percentage of women that used modern contraceptives that lived within each buffer zone of and SDP that offered at least three or five methods did not significantly change between four rounds. This may also suggest that living closer to a facility that has a larger range of available methods e does not increase the likelihood of using family planning services.

PMA2020 results show that there is a growing tendency among women in the DRC to use long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods (specifically, the implant method) (PMA2020, 2018). We, therefore, used frequency and percentage of SDPs that had at least one long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method as an indicator. Although the percentage of women using a modern contraceptive decreased with an increase in distance from an SDP with LARC methods in all rounds, this decline was not statistically significant. For instance, in round 2, the proportion of women using modern contraceptives varied from 19.3% in areas 250m from an SDP that provided LARC methods, to 18.4% in areas 1km from an SDP that provided LARC methods. In Rounds 3 to 5, the proportion of modern contraceptive users varied from 19.3%, 23.3%, and 22.0%in areas 250m from an SDP to 17.9%, 22.4%, and 20.3% in areas 1km from the same SDPs, respectively ( Table 2– Table 5).

On average more than 50% of SDPs were open seven days of the week. We limited our analysis to SDPs which were open every day of the week when measuring the availability of FP services and administrative access to services. In rounds 2 and 5, we found a decrease in the proportion of women using any modern contraceptive, as the distance from an SDP (that was open every day of the week) increased.

Stockouts are a significant barrier in accessing reproductive health services ⁴² in many countries. We attempted to verify if proximity to a facility that had not experienced a stock-out in the last three months could be a determinant in using FP services. There was no significant difference in the proportion of women using a modern method in close proximity to an SDP that had not experienced a stockout when compared to those that were further away from an SDP that had not experienced a stockout. However, in Round 5, the percentage of women using a modern method decreased from 25.3% to 21.5% when proximity to an SDP that had not experienced a stockout increased from 250m to 1km.

Facility services fees are a key financial barrier for women in accessing FP services ^{11, 43} . We tested if modern contraceptive use was higher among women that live closer to SDPs that provide services without fees. There was no significant difference between the proportion of women using modern contraceptives in any of the distance buffers of SDPs that provided services without fees.

Our findings show that, although proximity to an SDP was not significantly associated with an unmet need for family planning services, lower percentages of women with unmet need were found in buffer zones closer to SDPs with certain characteristics. In Round 2, the percentage of women with unmet need was lower among those 250m from an SDP that had five or more methods in stock, had no stockouts in the last three months, or had no fees for services. In Round 3, the percentage of women with unmet need was lower among those 250m from an SDPs that had five or more methods in stock or had no stockouts in the last three months. In round 4, the percentage of women with unmet need was lower among those 250m from an SDP that had no service fees.

This study’s aim was to assess the effect of proximity to family planning services on modern contraceptive use and unmet need for family planning among women living in Kinshasa. Our findings indicate that living in closer proximity to an SDP, even one with better availability and quality of FP services, does not increase the likelihood of modern contraceptive use among women in Kinshasa.

Many studies have analyzed physical access to a facility as a determinant of modern contraceptive use among women ^{3, 12, 22, 23, 25} . However, most of these studies have focused on the concept of distance decay, which measures how far living from an SDP decreases the likelihood of using FP or increases the likelihood of having unmet need. Few studies have tested the reverse hypothesis if living close to an SDP (even one with good quality services) changes women's likelihood of contraceptive use or having unmet need. In this study we hypothesized that facilities with better service availability and quality characteristics would have a higher proportion of contraceptive users and/or lower proportion of women with unmet need.

We discuss several probable explanations that could explain our results. For example, women in Kinshasa may not have the cognitive access required to utilize services in SDPs in close proximity of their residence. Cognitive access, as Bertrand et al. discussed, is the extent to which potential clients are aware of the locations of service or supply points and of the services available at these locations ¹¹ . Lack of knowledge regarding the existence of nearby SDPs would cause the unmet need for FP. This finding is consistent with a qualitative study performed in Kinshasa, where lack of knowledge about types and sources of contraceptives was among the reasons for not using contraceptive methods ⁴⁴ . Another study conducted in Chad found that a correlation exists between wealth and the knowledge about the family planning service providers ⁴⁵

Economic constraints could also be a barrier for women in accessing family planning services, even if they live in close proximity to an SDP. Gauthier and Wane found that individuals of lower socioeconomic status tend to seek care at lower quality facilities and bypass higher quality facilities because they cannot afford their services ⁴⁵ . Moreover, in a study conducted in Kinshasa, Muanda et al. found that the cost of contraceptive services is an important barrier for women and a primary reason for non-use. For example, we know that the demand for implants among women in Kinshasa is increasing ⁴⁶ . However, implants are one of the most expensive methods in Kinshasa and they are not available for free in most facilities. Thus, this economic barrier may be a reason why women in close proximity to SDPs refrain from using a modern method.

In addition, our findings confirm results of other studies conducted in the DRC and other sub-Saharan African countries in that they show that women prefer to bypass the closest facility to acquire their desired method from a facility farther away ^{45, 47– 49} . These studies provide several reasons as to why individuals chose to bypass the closest facility. For example, this could be due to a lack of confidence in the availability and quality of service in the closest facility ^{49, 50} . In a study in Egypt, Honge et al. found that that quality of family planning services available was a more prominent factor than the distance to the closest SDP in predicting use of IUDs among women ⁵¹ . Another study that evaluated bypassing behavior in Tanzania, showed that patients seek care at facilities that provide higher quality consultations, are staffed by more knowledgeable staff, and are better stocked with supplies ⁵² .

Additionally, other factors influence service utilization at a facility, such as the need and women’s intention to use family planning methods. Sociocultural norms can work as powerful motivators for women to bypass the closest facility to avoid encounters with family, neighbors, and friends. Women may also not use specific services despite the availability and quality of services if they do not intend to use modern contraception. Strong social norms that support large families are among the reasons cited as barriers to modern contraceptive use in Kinshasa ⁴⁴ . These norms also might be a strong barrier for some women to use modern contraceptives. As Muanda et al. mentioned in their article, in strongly pronatalist African countries, socio-cultural norms often play a significant role in the decision-making process for contraception use ⁵³ . They also discuss how cultural norms that support large families are the most difficult to address. In his article about high fertility norms in the DRC, Romanuik points to a mix of social, cultural and economic factors that encourage large families and the expectations from the husband’s family for numerous children in return for the dowry paid for the woman ⁵⁴ . Another study conducted in northern Ethiopia discussed the role of husbands’ approval of contraceptive use and knowledge of at least one contraceptive method as important factors that affect modern contraceptive use ⁵⁵ .

Although, studies have reported a significant correlation between distance to facilities and modern contraceptive use, especially in low and middle-income countries, ^{3, 12, 22, 23, 25} , the results of our analysis might be explained by other findings that indicate additional elements such as quality of services, economic access, and cultural factors that may influence contraceptive use ^{26, 27, 51, 56} . However, this analysis has several limitations and assumptions may influence our results. Our sampling approach limits the amount of data collected through facility surveys. The SDP survey collected data from 3-6 SDPs in each enumeration area. This number is a small fraction of all potential service delivery points and is not representative of the service and supply environment in Kinshasa. For a more accurate spatial analysis, a sample drawn from a census of all facilities would provide a more accurate measure of access to contraceptive methods. Whereas we know that women mat not necessarily use family planning services offered at the closest facility, data collection from a wider range of SDPs would shed light on other potential factors correlated with women’s choice of facility for contraceptive services.

The limited number of questions on the quality of available family planning services in the SDP survey also may also have influenced our findings. Although we assessed variables related to the quality of services in this analysis, the SDP survey does not provide the necessary information to comprehensively measure the quality of family planning services in the service delivery points in Kinshasa. For example, the PMA2020 SDP survey instrument does not capture any of the process factors of service quality (e.g. health provider’s method of delivering services including interpersonal interaction with the client and technical competency), and outcomes (e.g. client’s satisfaction of the family planning service) as discussed by Donbedian in his article about the quality of care ⁵⁷ .

Moreover, the distance calculated in this study is based on Euclidian distance measured between household location and the facility. Women who reside in a 1000-meter buffer of an SDP may need to travel a longer distance to reach the SDP. This approach usually underestimates the distance a woman should cross to reach the facility. Also, due to lack of information, we did not analyze other aspects of geographic distance, such as time travel and expense needed to reach each facility.

Another limitation of our study is our measurement of unmet need for family planning services, which was an analytically constructed variable. This means that there might be a discrepancy between having an unmet need for FP and the actual intention of women to seek contraceptive services ⁵⁸ . However, some studies show that in West and Central Africa, more than half of women with an unmet need intend to use modern contraceptives in the future ⁵⁹ .

Service delivery structure in the DRC (similar to most LMICs) consists of fixed facilities, pharmacies, community-based distribution workers, unofficial drug shops and campaign distribution days. Almost one fifth of all women who using modern contraceptives acquired their methods from a source of distribution other than fixed service delivery points. These sources range from community health workers, medical students, mobile nurses, or other official or unofficial sources such as friend and family, bars and night clubs, religious organizations, and other sources ^{46, 60– 62} . The SDP survey did not capture information from the campaign distribution days, community-based distribution, and unofficial drug shops. In addition, the SDP data used in this study does not link women to the SDP that they actually visited and where they obtained a contraceptive method. Since the sampled SDPs were located in an urban area which has a large number of official and unofficial facilities where women could potentially receive family planning services, there is a considerable chance that women who received FP services bypassed the closest SDP, even if the SDP offered the desirable FP services.

Finally, the information gathered through the SDP survey was cross-sectional data and did not provide a comprehensive picture of the everchanging supply environment in Kinshasa. Most of the supply chain is managed by multiple donors and implementing organizations which procure and distribute commodities in parallel to national system supply chain channels ⁶³ . This allows for a rapidly changing supply chain environment in which it is difficult to obtain comprehensive information regarding possible sources of contraceptive services.

This is the first study to use both population and facility-based data from the PMA2020 survey in Kinshasa to link key contraceptive use indicators and service availability at facilities. Our analysis shows that proximity to quality services does not necessarily result in increased FP use among women of reproductive age living in Kinshasa, thus suggesting that a bypass phenomenon may occur when obtaining modern contraceptive services. This study indicates that proximity to facilities does not necessarily equate proximity to methods, nor does it necessarily enable current users or women with an unmet need (potential contraceptive users) to easily obtain services for their method of choice. This study notes that other barriers to access may be substantial determinants of contraceptive use or unmet need. Further research should be conducted that directly measures multidimensional components of access in order to interpret women’s contraceptive seeking behaviors in urban areas of Sub-Saharan Africa.

Quantitative survey data are available with PMA2020 household/female datasets and service delivery point for the DRC (Round 2-5) at the IPUMS PMA website ( https://doi.org/10.18128/D081.V4.2) as well as the questionnaire. Datasets are free to download and available to public, but users are required to register and provide a description of the proposed research or analysis. GPS coordinates are not available for ethical reasons because even after removing directly identifiable information such as names and addresses, participant identity may be difficult to fully conceal, and research locations may remain potentially identifiable, presenting a risk of deductive disclosure. However, such information are available from the authors on reasonable request (email: sbabazad@tulane.edu).