Keywords
People living with HIV, Family Planning, Awareness, Accessibility
This article is included in the International Conference on Family Planning gateway.
People living with HIV, Family Planning, Awareness, Accessibility
Family planning is an important tool for improving the health and well-being of women and families. Accessibility and availability of family planning services is critical for improvement in maternal and child health. Unequal access to modern family planning services contribute to a slow decline in maternal mortality1.
These maternal deaths can be reduced by making essential family planning services available and accessible to all women who are in need, including women living with HIV. In Myanmar, provision of quality family planning services and prevention of sexually transmitted disease (RTI/STI) including HIV are core areas under the National Five Year Strategic Plan for Reproductive Health (2014–2018)2.
Reaching the poorest, hardest to reach and most vulnerable population like people living with HIV (PLHIV) became prioritized strategy in reducing unmet need for family planning and increasing contraceptive prevalence rate3. Because of continuous quality care, support, and treatment, PLHIV live longer than before. PLHIV have the right to possess a family life, as do other people. They have the right to decide their family size and right to have information on family planning methods and range of choice. However, there is limited assessment on awareness on family planning services among women living with HIV in Myanmar.
Therefore, this operational research was carried out to understand the awareness and accessibility to family planning services among women of reproductive age living with HIV in Myanmar and the challenges to access the information and family planning services. The findings from this research would provide information to Maternal and Reproductive health program, Myanmar to provide quality care to this vulnerable group.
This study was a cross-sectional descriptive study using both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. Data collection was done from January to February 2018.
General setting. The Republic of the Union of Myanmar is a low-income country located in South-East Asia. It is bordered by Bangladesh, India to the west side, China, Laos and Thailand towards the north and eastern sides, and 1760 miles of the coast line by the Bay of Bengal and the Andaman Sea in the south and south-west. There are 14 states/regions and one Nay Pyi Taw Union Territory. Myanmar consists of 74 districts, 330 townships, 398 towns, 3065 wards, 13,619 village tracts and 64,134 villages. Myanmar is actively engaged in building a new, modern, peaceful, developed and democratic nation. In 2014, the total population was 51.4 million with an average population density of 80 people/km24.
HIV/AIDS situation in Myanmar. Myanmar is one of the 35 UNAIDS fast track priority countries that account for 90% of new HIV infections globally. The country has a concentrated HIV epidemic among urban areas and key populations. There has been good progress towards reducing the burden of disease evidence by a decline in prevalence among the general adult population from 0.9% in 2000 to 0.6% in 2016. A significant decline also has been seen in HIV-related mortality5,6.
The National AIDS Programme (NAP), under Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health and Sports, is taking the leading role to fight against HIV/AIDS in the country. NAP antiretroviral therapy (ART) services are currently delivered through 127 ART centres, and 174 decentralized sites which may be at the township level, sub-township level and station health units or rural health centre, as indicated by burden of disease5.
Maternal and Reproductive Health Division (MRH). With the goal “To attain a better quality of life and ensure universal accessibility of reproductive health and rights by contributing quality reproductive health care services for women, men, adolescents and youth”, the MRH is leading for maternal and reproductive health care services in the country in collaboration with international and national partners. Maternal deaths in Myanmar has been declined from 453/100,000 live births in 1990 to 178/100,000 live births according to UN Interagency Estimates 20157. Contraceptive prevalence rate (modern methods) and unmet need for contraception were 51% and 16%, respectively as revealed by the Myanmar Demographic Health Survey, 2015–20168. In line with the Myanmar National Health Plan (2017–2021), and National Strategic Plan for Reproductive Health (2014–2018), Myanmar MRH is providing quality care services for women in Myanmar to achieve Myanmar UN Sustainable Development Goal targets by 2030.
For quantitative portion, this study included reproductive age women (15–49 years) living with HIV. They were on ART from two selected ART centers at two districts with the high burden of HIV in Myanmar. For qualitative portion, this study included reproductive age women (15–49 years) living with HIV, and service providers.
For the quantitative portion of the study, included were HIV positive women of reproductive age who were receiving care from the selected ART centers. A sample size was calculated using OpenEpi. A cross-sectional single proportion method was used setting proportion of service accessibility as 79%9, precision as 0.06%, and alpha at 0.05%. Thus, the minimal required sample size was 177. From the lists of ART registers from selected ART sites, HIV positive women of reproductive age were pre-identified, and randomly selected before the day their visits to ART centers. At the day of data collection, those identified HIV positive women were recruited for this study after obtaining their consent. A total of 184 women with HIV were included in this study.
For qualitative portion, 19 women living with HIV were purposively selected to include in this study based on their ability to cooperate and discuss. Their ability of cooperation and discussion was assessed during a face-to-face interview, and also discussion of service providers who knew about their clients very well. Two key informant interviews with two service providers were also done. The interview guide is available as Extended data10. One service provider was from maternal and reproductive health teams whose role was to provide overall supervision and monitoring of the MRH services to the communities in the district. Another service provider was a team leader from ART team at the district who managed the care for HIV positive people.
For the quantitative portion, face-to-face interviews were done using semi-structured questionnaires by six trained data collectors from Department of Medical Research. Semi-structured questionnaires was developed and pretested based on the tools used in previous study in Myanmar9. The questionnaires are available as Extended data10. Perceived geographical accessibility to family planning services among women living with HIV was measured in this study. High geographical accessibility was defined as those who lived within a 30-minute travel and within a one-mile distance from the nearest health facility which provides family planning services, and those who were aware that the service existed9.
For qualitative portion, one focus group discussions (FGD) with women living with HIV from each ART center was done with 9 to 10 participants in each FGD using FGD guideline. Each FGD included both married and unmarried women with different ages to get information from different dimensions. This study included total two FGDs. Both FGDs were moderated by the principle investigator (H.H.L.) who had enough experiences for qualitative data collection, and note takings were done by trained note takers from Department of Medical Research. The FGD was conducted at a place of convenience to the participants. Both FGDs were conducted in rooms located near ART teams in the same compound, but away from the influence of health staff. Audio-recording was done with the permission from the participants. Each FGD took approximately one hour. Key informant interviews with service providers were done by K.T.S. using KII guideline. Each KII took approximately 45 min. No repeated discussion was needed for FGDs/KIIs. Information was regarded as saturated from the completed FGDs and KIIs.
For the quantitative portion, data from face to face interviews was entered using EpidataVer3.2 software and analyzed using SPSS v20. Descriptive analysis was done, and frequency and proportion of variables of interests were presented in text and tables.
For the qualitative portion, transcripts from FGDs and KIIs were made in Myanmar language the same day based on the verbatim notes of the interview and audio recordings. All the transcripts obtained were combined and the principal investigator (H.H.L.) read the transcript to become familiar with the data. Manual descriptive thematic analysis was used by the principal investigator to analyze the transcripts. It was reviewed by a second investigator (K.T.S.) to reduce bias and subjectivity in interpretation. The decision of coding rules and theme generation was done in consensus among investigators. Any difference between the two was resolved by discussion. The study findings were reported according to consolidated guidelines for reporting qualitative research (COREQ)11.
Approval to conduct this study was obtained from Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health and Sports, Myanmar [105/Oct/2017/DOPH/MOHS]. Participants were informed about the study through participant information sheet. Those who gave the written informed consent were recruited in this study. Participants had the right to withdrawal from this study at any time. Data confidentiality and anonymity of study participants were maintained strictly throughout the study.
This study included 184 women living with HIV. The mean (SD) of them was 38(9) years, 121 (66%) were from rural areas, and 118 (62%) had primary and secondary education. Of them, 135 (73%) were working for a living at the time of survey. The average income of them was 150000MMKs (150USD) per month. In total, 90 women (49%) were married, 10 (5%) were single (Table 1). The results of the quantitative aspect of the study are available as Underlying data12.
Characteristics | Respondents, n (%) |
---|---|
Age group (years)* | |
15–24 | 11 (6) |
25–34 | 41 (22) |
35–44 | 90 (49) |
45 and above | 42 (23) |
Education | |
Read and write | 5 (3) |
Primary | 70 (38) |
Middle | 46 (25) |
High | 28 (15) |
University | 13 (7) |
Did not respond | 21 (11) |
Marital status | |
Married | 89 (49) |
Single | 10 (5) |
Divorced | 16 (9) |
Separate | 5 (3) |
Widow | 64 (35) |
Working for earning | |
Yes | 135 (73) |
Average income= 150USD |
Among the respondents, 124 (67%) have never received health education on family planning, and 64 (35%) didn’t know any source of information for family planning services. Among married women, 16 (29%) intended to have child. One-fourth of women with HIV responded that transmission of HIV from mother to child cannot be preventable; “preventing by taking ART” was the most mentioned answer. However, a majority (97%) of them had heard of any type of modern contraceptive methods. Oral contraceptive pills and injection methods were the most mentioned method by the respondents (Table 2 and Figure 1).
EC, emergency contraceptive; IUCD, intrauterine contraceptive device; OC, oral contraceptive.
In the last six months, 55 (30%) of respondents have used any type of contraception, and more percentage of women used contraceptive methods from private services (Table 3).
Perceived geographical accessibility to family planning services among women living with HIV was measured in this study. High geographical accessibility was defined as those who lived within 30 minutes travel and within a one-mile distance from the nearest health facility that provides family planning services, and those who were aware that the service existed. This study showed only 7% of respondents had high perceived geographical accessibility to family services (Table 4).
The main challenges to accessing family planning information and services among women living with HIV were also explored from qualitative data collection methods. Most of participants responded that they had poor knowledge and received not enough information on the family planning services Some of them mentioned they had financial constraints to access modern contraceptive methods. Key informant interviews with public service providers revealed that there was the lack of referral system, and poor linkage between Maternal and Reproductive Health Teams, and ART centers for women living with HIV to provide the quality family planning services (Table 5).
This operational research was the first ever study to explore the awareness, the accessibility and major challenges to family planning services among women with HIV. This study highlighted that there was low awareness and low accessibility among women living with HIV on family planning services provided by both public and private sectors in Myanmar, and addressed some key challenges.
This study had strengths to address. First, this study represents women living with HIV who were under the care of NAP services. The perceptions from both service providers and women living with HIV were explored. However, we would like to acknowledge some limitations of this study. This study could not represent the whole population of women living with HIV in Myanmar, and those who were out of NAP care were not included in this study.
This study had three key findings. Firstly, regardless of marital status, two-thirds of women living with HIV had never received any health talks, health education related to family planning services in their life time. Moreover, one-third of them did not know any type of public and private family planning services. Similar to previous local study, it indicates the comprehensive reproductive health care towards HIV-positive women was needed13.
Secondly, this study showed low accessibility to family planning services among women living with HIV (7%). This unsatisfactory accessibility to family planning services was similar with the findings from a previous study conducted among adolescents in the general population in Myanmar9.
Thirdly, major challenges to access the information and family planning services were limited information, financial constraints, and poor linkage between MRH and NAP in Myanmar. As Myanmar is one of the countries in the southeast Asia regions hit hardest by HIV epidemic, and the majority of HIV-infected people are of reproductive age, this study highlighted the needs to provide better quality care for family planning services. Though these vulnerable populations receive quality care, support, and treatment services from the National AIDS Program, the referral and linkage system to support their choice for family planning services are still questionable. To achieve the targeted contraceptive rate, and reduce the maternal mortalities in Myanmar, every woman with HIV should have access to the right information and services.
This study recommends implementing the effective referral system for those women with HIV who attend ART centers and who are in need of family planning services. Proper counseling of women with HIV regarding available family planning services, proper recording and reporting for women with HIV who need family planning advice, regular meetings between authorities from National AIDS Program, and Maternal and Reproductive Health Division would help to improve the provision of these services.
Underlying data Figshare: FP PLHIV MM_CSV.csv. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8275040.v112.
This project contains the following underlying data:
FP PLHIV MM_CSV.csv (spreadhseet containing all results to structured questionnaires)
DDS FP PLHIV.docx (data dictionary for the above spreadsheet)
To protect the confidentiality of the participants, transcripts of focus group discussions are not available. However, these transcripts can be made available to reviewers in the local language upon request. Enquiries for access should be addressed to Dr Hnin Hnin Lwin at hninhninlwin@gmail.com.
Transcripts of key informant interviews cannot be shared because of confidentiality concerns, since individuals can be readily identified from the contents of these interviews.
Figshare: FP PLHIV MM Questionnaires and Guidelines. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.8275076.v110.
This project contains the following extended data:
02 Questionnaire Eng_FP_PLHIV MM.docx (English translation of questionnaire for women living with HIV/AIDS)
04 FGD guidelines Eng_FP_PLHIV MM.docx (English translation of focus group guidelines)
06 KII with provider guideline Eng_FP PLHIV MM.docx (English translation of key informant interview guide)
Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
Funding for this study was granted by Ministry of Health and Sports, Myanmar [5(ka)(thu)sa/2017(13912)kalaya]. Publication of this study was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1181398).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Authors would like to express our sincere thanks to Dr Hla Mya Thway Einda, Director, Maternal and Reproductive Health Division, Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health and Sports, Myanmar, Dr Htun Nyunt Oo, Deputy Director/Program Manager, and Dr San Hone, Deputy Director, National AIDS Programme, Department of Public Health, Ministry of Health and Sports, Myanmar for their kind support throughout the study.
Views | Downloads | |
---|---|---|
Gates Open Research | - | - |
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
|
- | - |
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: "sexual and reproductive health" "maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health"
Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?
Partly
Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?
Yes
Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?
Yes
If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?
Yes
Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?
Partly
Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?
Partly
References
1. Sarnquist CC, Moyo P, Stranix-Chibanda L, Chipato T, et al.: Integrating family planning and prevention of mother to child HIV transmission in Zimbabwe.Contraception. 2014; 89 (3): 209-14 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full TextCompeting Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Reviewer Expertise: Mother and Child Health research and clinical care predominantly in Myanmar women.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Invited Reviewers | ||
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
Version 1 05 Jul 19 |
read | read |
Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list:
Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles
Register with Gates Open Research
Already registered? Sign in
If you are a previous or current Gates grant holder, sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from Gates Open Research.
We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to Gates Open Research
The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.
You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.
To sign in, please click here.
If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.
If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password.
If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance.
Comments on this article Comments (0)