Skip to content
ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article

Lessons learned from a public sector community-based distribution program for scaling up DMPA-SC contraceptive services in Nigeria

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 26 Jun 2019
Author details Author details

This article is included in the International Conference on Family Planning gateway.

Abstract

Background: From August 2016 to December 2017, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) in Nigeria, through three implementing partners, scaled up the public sector delivery of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC, brand name Sayana Press) across 10 states. The public sector program featured a proactive community-based distribution (CBD) model, led by community health extension workers (CHEWs) and supported by community health volunteers (CHVs).
 
Methods: We conducted monitoring and evaluation (M&E) alongside program implementation to understand the program’s reach, particularly in terms of clients served, and their proportions of new users of modern contraception and younger women. Key performance indicators (KPIs) were calculated from end-user data digitized from client registers. To evaluate performance trends over time and understand geographic variation, we analyzed quarterly data in Excel and Stata 15, and complemented these analyses with data from interviews conducted periodically with program staff and performance documentation submitted by implementing partners.
 
Results: The program reached 144,505 clients, of whom 88% (n=127,315) were women. Among women reached, 92% (n=116,614) chose DMPA-SC. The program reached a high percentage of new users of modern contraception: 80% (n=93,075) of DMPA-SC clients were new users, as were 80% (n=111,350) of overall clients. However, only 26% (n=36,313) of clients were under 25. From performance reports and interviews with program staff, many involved credited the CBD model with reaching a client base largely comprised of new users of modern contraception.
 
Conclusions: Our analysis of the Nigeria public sector DMPA-SC program suggests that the combination of DMPA-SC and proactive CBD may accelerate contraceptive uptake and reduce unmet need in Nigeria. While some strategies for increasing the cost-efficiency of the CBD emerged, future research on this delivery model should focus on key concerns about the modality’s sustainability.

Keywords

Injectable contraceptive, subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, Nigeria, social marketing, private sector, public sector, community based distribution

Introduction

In Nigeria, unmet need for contraception remains high (16% among married women) and the modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR) remains low (15% among women of reproductive age)1,2. Challenges to increasing contraception use include a lack of reproductive health knowledge among potential users, bias among providers towards young and unmarried women, and restrictive cultural norms1,3,4. As part of the strategy to reach the national goal of 27% mCPR by 20205, DMPA-SC (subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, brand name: Sayana© Press), a three-month, progestin-only injectable contraceptive, was introduced into Nigeria’s contraceptive method mix in 20156. Because of its unique features—a lower-dose formulation than the intramuscular version (Depo Provera) packaged in the all-in-one Uniject™ system—DMPA-SC permits easier administration by lower-skilled individuals, which has the potential to reduce barriers to contraceptive access and uptake7.

Given the importance of both public and private sector provision of health services in Nigeria, policymakers embraced a total market approach for expanding contraceptive service provision to include DMPA-SCa. In 2015, DKT Nigeria, an NGO specializing in contraceptive social marketing, introduced DMPA-SC into the retail market in seven states in South West Nigeria, distributing to private providers at hospitals, clinics, drugs shops, and wholesalers6. In late 2016, after completing a pilot project in two states, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), in collaboration with three implementing partners (IPs), expanded contraceptive services to include DMPA-SC in 10 states while DKT Nigeria scaled private sector distribution to all states.

As part of the introduction and national scale-up of DMPA-SC Nigeria, we conducted standardized external monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of program operations with the following specific goals: (a) tracking overall service-delivery key performance indicators; and (b) assessing to what extent contraceptive services, including DMPA-SC, were reaching younger women and new users of modern contraception. Published findings from the introductory DMPA-SC private sector program are detailed elsewhere6. In brief, lessons from the private sector experience included: (a) challenges in sustaining community-based distribution (CBD) amid cost-recovery aspirations; (b) targeting high-volume facilities and wholesalers to enhance distribution; and (c) insufficiently reaching underserved populations (e.g., younger, poorer women) among DMPA-SC recipients.

This paper aims to describe the challenges experienced and lessons learned from the public sector DMPA-SC scale-up in Nigeria in 2016-2017. Because the public sector DMPA-SC program was centered around community-based distribution (CBD) service delivery model and was implemented by three NGO partners across 10 states, the specific M&E objectives for this program were to: (a) document performance in key performance indicators (KPIs) across states and IPs; (b) identify the factors that facilitated or challenged program implementation and DMPA-SC uptake; and (c) summarize the lessons learned from this experience to inform future national scale-up. We analyzed information sources from program data and narrative reporting documents to describe KPIs related to program reach, including method uptake and user sociodemographic profiles. We further discuss the results of our analysis and their implications for scaling DMPA-SC throughout the public sector in Nigeria.

The UNFPA public sector DMPA-SC program in Nigeria

Overview

UNFPA’s public sector DMPA-SC program was based on the implementation model of a previous, small-scale 2015 pilot project. The 2015 pilot, implemented in two states, Kebbi and Ebonyi used CBD for service provision and leveraged a 2014 government policy shift that expanded the scope of work for Community Health Extension Workers (CHEWs) to allow them to administer injectable contraceptives8. The 2015 pilot showed promise9, and, as a result, the Nigeria Ministry of Health, in partnership with UNFPA, planned to follow the pilot’s model as they expanded the public sector introduction of DMPA-SC to 10 states in July 2016. Public sector scale-up program states (described in Table 1) were selected based from the following criteria: (a) states with high unmet need and large numbers of estimated public sector contraception clients; (b) states that would represent all Nigeria’s geopolitical zones; (c) areas where the public sector DMPA-SC pilots had already occurred; (d) states where previous public health programs had developed cadres of experienced health volunteers; and (e) not located in the South West, where the private sector DMPA-SC program had been launched6.

Table 1. Geographical coverage and implementation features.

Action Health Incorporated
(AHI)
Planned Parenthood
Federation of Nigeria (PPFN)
Association for Reproductive and
Family Health (ARFH)
Geography: state,
geopolitical zone1, and local
government areas (LGAs)
3 states
•   Cross River, SS (6 LGAs)
•   Akwa Ibom, SS (6 LGAs)
•   Abia, SE (6 LGAs)
3 states
•   Benue, NC (2 LGAs)
•   Kaduna, NW (2 LGAs)
•   Federal Capital Territory
(Abuja), NC (2 LGAs)
4 states
•   Kebbi, NW (7 LGAs)
•   Ebonyi, SE (8 LGAs)
•   Gombe, NE (11 LGAs)
•   Sokoto, NW (6 LGAs)
DMPA-SC2 provision
by Community Health
Volunteers (CHVs)
Permitted only for reinjectionsNot permittedPermitted only for reinjections
Strategies to reach
underserved young women
•   Conducted specific
stakeholder focus groups
•   Outreach on university
campuses
•   Recruited peers as CHVs
•   Screened providers for age
bias during recruitment
•   Recruited peers as CHVs
•   Outreach to youth clubs and
young adult gatherings
•   Recruited peers as CHVs
•   No overall explicit focus for
young people indicated
CHV Compensation•   Transport stipend to attend
monthly outreach events
•   Small stipend to attend
monthly data reporting
meetings.
•   Small stipend to attend
monthly meetings
•   Small monthly stipend plus
transportation allowance
to attend monthly data
reporting meetings.
•   Transportation stipend to attend
monthly meetings
•   Small-business training and
microfinance support offered
to CHVs in at least one state
(Ebonyi)
•   Recruited unemployed CHEWs
with prospects of future
employment opportunities
•   Weekly transport allowance

1 NE=North East, NC=North Central, NW=North West, SE=South East, SS=South South

2 DMPA-SC= subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

UNFPA coordinated implementation for three IPs: Action Health Incorporated (AHI), Planned Parenthood Federation of Nigeria (PPFN), and the Association for Reproductive and Family Health (ARFH). UNFPA selected IPs based on their experience with CBD, reproductive health programming history, success reaching marginalized populations, and/or presence in different states. Each IP was responsible for implementation in several states (see Table 1). Program implementation was targeted toward selected urban and peri-urban areas in each state, with participating primary health centers (PHCs) selected based on catchment area size and available health human resources available in local government areas (LGAs).

The program officially launched in July 2016, beginning with a planning, coordination, and preparation phase. This was followed by a provider training phase (November 2016 – February 2017), after which the final phase, program implementation, reached full capacity in March 2017 and continued until September 2017. Thereafter, program coordination was expected to transition to the control of state-level government managersb.

Operational model

Modeled after the experience of the 2015 two-state pilot, the public sector program was structured around CBD, but IPs were free and encouraged to adapt program features based on their own organizational strengths and experiences and on the context of the local environment (e.g. cultural norms, population density).

IPs used two types of community outreach to raise awareness for contraceptive services and deliver products to users: group mobilizations and individual outreach. Group mobilizations were informational presentations designed to engage large groups of women in community spaces including markets, community centers, churches, and other gathering places. For individual outreach, program workers made household visits, knocking on doors and introducing themselves to potential clients. Outreach workers were primarily community health volunteers (CHVs) and were connected to supervising CHEWs at PHCs in small hub-and-spoke networks.

CHVs and CHEWs were the two types of health workers trained and deployed for community mobilization and service delivery.

CHVs were primarily lay volunteers recruited and trained to conduct community outreach. Across all states, CHVs counseled women on method options and were able to provide nonprescriptive contraception: male condoms, female condoms, contraceptive pills. CHVs working with AHI and ARFH were permitted to administer DMPA-SC for reinjection, but were required to refer first-time potential injection clients or other long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods to CHEWs. CHVs working with PPFN’s program were not permitted to administer DMPA-SC.

CHEWs who were employed at PHCs were tasked with counseling new clients interested in contraception and offering informed choice provision. CHEWs also fielded referrals from CHVs for clients, including those reached through group mobilizations, who wished to receive facility-based contraceptive services (e.g. DMPA-IM injections, implants, or IUDs).

Health worker training

UNFPA adapted training curricula and tools from global training resources developed by PATH10,11. IPs recruited and trained one CHEW per PHC who was recommended by local health managers. As part of the training curriculum, CHEWs received refresher information on general contraception and supplemental training on DMPA-SC.

For CHV candidacy, minimum requirements were proficiency in English and completion of primary school. IPs recruited CHVs from different candidate pools, with a general goal of finding volunteers who had previous health campaign experience. CHVs received training on interacting with users, establishing referral relationships with CHEWs, general information on contraception, and basic reporting practices. Patent and proprietary medicine vendors (PPMVs) were excluded from participating in the program.

ARFH developed a series of visual guidance materials to facilitate the training of CHVs for all IPs. These “job aids” included information on basic child health, HIV/AIDS, contraception, informed choice strategies, and DMPA-SC.

Volunteer compensation

IPs provided moderate compensation to CHVs in the form of stipends. CHVs were required to attend monthly debriefing meetings and return data collection forms, for which they received reimbursement for transportation costs. AHI and PPFN paid CHVs an additional 2,000N (~$5.50 USD) per month cash stipend. ARFH implemented a small-scale microfinance scheme to support health workers in Ebonyi and had planned to expand the model through all their program states, but was unable to secure support to do so.

Program data reporting

CHEWs and CHVs recorded all user interactions in a standard client register, adapted from the Ministry of Health’s Family Planning Register to include data fields relevant to the dispensing of DMPA-SC (see methods below). CHEWs used the registers to record each client encounter. CHVs used a simplified tally sheet to record methods given out to clients; simplified sheets were used to facilitate data tracking by individuals with low literacy. CHEWs collected tally sheets from CHVs every week, data from which was used as the basis of resupply to CHVs.

The DMPA-SC public sector program used additional data tools for monitoring and supervision. IPs used weekly and monthly supervisor forms to track performance by CHEWs and PHCs. IPs also tracked referral slips used by CHVs and CHEWs to record facility visits. IP program managers collected data tools from CHEWs and CHVs at monthly data validation meetings. IP staff entered the raw data and sent aggregated reports to UNFPA each quarter. Supply chain forms were used by program managers to track commodity levels and request resupplies every two months.

Methods

Key performance indicators (KPIs)

During project planning, all participating program partners agreed to a set of KPIs to track during program implementation. To develop these KPIs, each partner outlined monitoring objectives and identified possible metrics for the program given their implementation plans and strategies. KPI focus areas were identified based on common interest across all partners, the feasibility of collecting comparable data across IPs, and their applicability to all implementation strategies. The final set of KPIs included the number of users and services delivered, the number of providers trained, previous use of contraception by program beneficiaries, and the age profile of users. Some KPIs, including percent of new users reached and number of DMPA-SC units administered, had specific targets (20% for new users reached and 325,000 overall DMPA-SC units administered) that were agreed upon by implementing organizations and donors at the outset of the program.

Data sources and analysis

Data inputs for calculating KPIs came from several sourcesc:

  • 1. A client registry containing basic information for all user interactions: date of service; client name; client phone number; client address; age; sex; method(s) provided; quantity of method(s) provided; and additional notes. Registry data were entered into an electronic database by UNFPA and were extracted for quarterly M&E reporting purposes. During the transition of program coordination from UNFPA and IPs to state reproductive health agencies (starting in September 2017), data collection and reporting to UNFPA occurred only on an ad-hoc basis and finally ceased altogether by December 2017. Data contained in Excel for Office 365 MSO 16.0 64-bit spreadsheets were imported into Stata version 15 for analysis. We conducted standard data cleaning procedures for data entry consistency and labeling; inconsistencies were flagged and reconciled in consultation with UNFPA and IPs. From that data, we calculated summary statistics for KPIs according to specific definitions laid out in the M&E Plan.

  • 2. Program documents from IPs were regularly collected. These included field reports from IP program officers, summary quarterly reports detailing program updates and KPI achievements, training attendance records, activity budget spreadsheets, and workplans and timelines. Data from program documents were systematically organized in an Excel spreadsheet by IP and state to facilitate comparisons across settings along important dimensions (e.g., outreach strategies deployed, types of participants recruited). See extended data for the documents used12.

  • 3. UCSF research staff conducted periodic interviews with program managers in UNFPA and implementing partners (via teleconference in August and September 2017 and via teleconference and in-person meetings in Nigeria in November and December 2018) to provide additional context for understanding program operations and resolving questions about KPI calculations. Most interviews lasted 30–60 minutes and included either one or multiple representatives from each IP. Interviews with each IP were conducted separately, and information across partners was not shared except in summary report format. See extended data for materials used for phone interviews12.

KPI data were descriptively analyzed for variation across time, states, and IPs. A subset of KPIs were measured against target outputs set at the beginning of the program. In accordance with populations of interest for program reach, we focused on the following categorizations of users:

  • (a) By age: under 20, 20 through 24, and 25 and older

  • (b) By visit type: “new users” who had never used modern contraception before; “repeat visits” who had previously used a modern method including DMPA-SC; and “switchers” who had recently used another modern method and opted for DMPA-SC insteadd.

We cross-referenced variations in KPIs with information from program documents and personnel interviews to understand their associations with operational strategies deployed. By KPI categories of interest, we organized the emerging program features and contextual factors that facilitated or hindered implementation or influenced program achievement.

Ethical approvals

The Institutional Review Boards at the University of California, San Francisco (IRB# 15-18353) and the Nigeria Health Research Ethics Committee (NHREC/01/01/2007-06/01/2016 and NHREC/01/01/2007-16th/02/2017) approved this research. Periodic interviews with program managers focused on organizational operations and did not require informed consent per human subjects research guidelines.

Results

Health worker recruitment and training

IPs recruited and trained providers from November 2016 through February 2017, with most training complete by the end of January 2017. Table 2 shows the number of CHEWs and CHVs trained by IP (see underlying data12). In total, the program trained 3,764 providers; 1,649 CHEWs and 2,115 CHVs. ARFH, who had previously managed a program that trained CHEWs to provide injectable contraception, trained approximately 50% more CHEWs than CHVs (940 CHEWs, 600 CHVs). Among the CHEWs recruited and trained by ARFH, a large portion were previously unemployed or under-employed, and thus not formally engaged to staff PHCs; they were able to serve as community-based outreach workers, given the same tasks as most CHVs, with added permission to offer prescriptive contraception to first-time users by virtue of their licensing. In contrast, AHI and PPFN both trained approximately twice as many CHVs as CHEWs (AHI: 375 CHEWs, 740 CHVs; PPFN: 334 CHEWs, 775 CHVs).

Table 2. Health workers trained and deployed.

Implementing partner1StateCHEWs2CHVs2Total
N%N%
AHIAbia10029.0%24571.0%345
Akwa Ibom14028.6%35071.4%490
Cross River13548.2%14551.8%280
PPFNBenue5028.7%12471.3%174
FCT (Abuja)2528.1%6471.9%89
Kaduna25930.6%58769.4%846
ARFHEbonyi17058.6%12041.4%290
Gombe21063.8%11936.2%329
Kebbi28070.0%12030.0%400
Sokoto28053.7%24146.3%521
Total3164943.8%211556.2%3,764

1AHI = Action Health Incorporated; PPFN = Planned Parenthood Federation of Nigeria; ARFH = Association for Reproductive and Family Health

2CHEWs = Community Health Extension Workers; CHVs = Community Health Volunteers

Many CHVs engaged by IPs had worked on previous health campaigns (e.g. vaccination campaigns) and had shown a desire to continue working on public health programs. According to personnel interviews, recruiting CHVs with prior volunteer experience not only reduced training and recruitment costs, but also helped to ensure that volunteers were intrinsically motivated to stay engaged throughout the program.

Contraceptive service delivery

From August 2016 through December 2017, the program reached a cumulative 144,505 clients, including 17,022e men (12% of total clients). Figure 1 displays the trends in cumulative distribution of DMPA-SC over the duration of the project period and delineates the three project phases. From August – November 2016, IPs were primarily engaged in preparatory work, including liaising with state-level government officials and local program managers in the targeted implementation areas. The period of November 2016 – February 2017 was dedicated to recruiting and training CHEWs and CHVs. Although IPs were ready to commence full program activities once trainings were complete, delays in DMPA-SC procurement meant that service delivery did not reach full operational capacity until March 2017.

4971224e-a24b-45ba-aef6-41ce693d8f7a_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Cumulative subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) distribution over time by state.

1FCT = Federal Capital Territory (Abuja).

IPs accelerated service delivery following the procurement delay. From March through August 2017, the program reached 120,455 contraceptive clients (83% of total clients); the program reached 65% of all its clients during the three-month period from April through June 2017. By October 2017, the program surpassed its overall clients reached target (100,000f clients). During the transition period from August to December 2017, as program management was handed over to state reproductive health agencies, an additional 6,674 clients (5% of total) were recorded in the client registry from ad-hoc reporting by IPs.

According to interviews and quarterly field reports, program staff felt that CBD had high utility for reaching contraceptive clients, particularly clients who had not previously been able to connect with reproductive health services. Program staff stressed the importance of both types of community outreach. Public mobilizations, often held in markets, were reported as effective for raising awareness and providing an efficient pathway to reach large numbers of potential users. Staff also reported that visits to individual households were effective for reaching women who may have been underserved by the traditional health system, including those who live in areas with more restrictive cultural norms. Strategies for engaging with women at their homes included framing contraception activities in the general interest of family health and visiting when male partners were not home.

ARFH, which was active in four program states (compared to three states for AHI and PPFN), delivered services to the most clients among IPs (n=80,299; 56% of total clients), followed by AHI (n=35,562; 25%) and PPFN (n=28,644; 20%)g. Because the size of the catchment area for each state was unknown, we compared the median number of clients reached per state as well as the number of clients reached per trained health worker (CHVs and CHEWs) to assess relative performance. Across all states over the entire program period, the median number of overall clients reached per state and median clients reached per health worker were 15,070 and 44, respectively. On a per-state basis, ARFH also had the highest median numbers of clients reached (19,930), followed by AHI (12,026) and PPFN (10,862). Per provider in each state, ARFH also had the highest median number of clients reached (49), followed by PPFN (42) and AHI (29). In three states (Ebonyi, Gombe, and Kebbi) where ARFH had previously managed reproductive health programs with CHEWs and injectable contraceptives, overall users and per-provider clients reached were all above-median. Programs in these three states represented 43% of overall clients reached and, along with PPFN’s Benue program (62 clients reached per provider), had among the highest number of clients reached per health worker (Ebonyi: 57; Gombe: 66, Kebbi: 60).

Clients reached across sex and age groups

Table 3 describes characteristics of clients reached by UNFPA’s public sector program (see underlying data12). Among IPs, AHI’s client base had the highest percentage of women (92% of clients reached; n=32,775/35,562), followed by PPFN (91%; n=25,965/28,587) and ARFH (86%; n=68,575/80,188)h.

Table 3. Program performance.

AHI1PPFN1ARFH1Total
N%N%N%N%
Users35,56224.628,64419.880,29955.6144,505100
Sex (excludes 168 missing, 0.12%)
   Female32,77592.225,96590.868,57585.5127,31588.2
   Male2,7877.82,6229.211,61314.517,02211.8
Age (excludes 3,434 missing, 2.43%)
   Under 203,4209.61,4004.93,3784.48,1985.8
   20–247,95822.45,86120.514,29618.628,11519.9
   25+24,18468.02126774.659,28777.0104,73874.3
Method taken (excludes 84 missing, 0.06%)
   DMPA-SC232,23885.424,28277.960,09475.9116,61482.7
   Male condom4,78612.75,64818.113,32116.823,75516.8
   Female condom6741.84271.43,1974.04,2983.0
   Oral pills320.12750.92,0292.62,3361.7
   Other injectable00.04441.45420.79860.7
   LARC300.01100.4260.01360.1
Visit type (excludes 5,330 missing, 3.83%)
   New user25,24376.520,19572.165,91284.4111,35078.9
   Repeat user6,19218.86,84924.58,16910.521,21015.0
   Switcher1,5804.89503.44,0015.16,5314.6

1 AHI = Action Health Incorporated; PPFN = Planned Parenthood Federation of Nigeria; ARFH = Association for Reproductive and Family Health

2 DMPA-SC= subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

3 LARC = long-acting reversible contraception

Among clients reached by the program, 104,738 (74%) were older than 25, 28,115 (20%) were between 20 and 25, and 8,198 (6%) were under 20. Among IPs and overall clients reached, AHI reached the highest percentage of under-20 users (10%; n=3,420/35,562), followed by PPFN (5%; n=1,400/28,528) and ARFH (4%; n=3,378/76,961)i. Percentages of clients reached by age category were similar among DMPA-SC clients. According to field reports and interviews with program staff, AHI credited a series of operational decisions for their higher youth user rates: they conducted focus group discussions with young people to assess potential uptake of contraception and DMPA-SC; they recruited younger CHVsj; they screened providers for potential age bias; and they targeted group mobilizations to youth-dense locations (e.g. university campuses). Whereas ARFH reported no specific focus on youth-oriented programming, PPFN also reported recruiting younger CHVs from existing youth volunteer networks, but did not have other strategies to tailor strategies toward younger populations.

Method choice

Of the 144,505 clients reached by the program, 81% (n=116,614) received DMPA-SC; all DMPA-SC recipients were women and 92% of all women clients (n=116,614/127,315) received DMPA-SC.

For non-DMPA-SC methods, the recipients of which included both male and female clients, 16% (n=23,755) of all clients received male condoms (64% of male condom recipients were male; 36% female), followed by female condoms (3% of all; n=4,298; 11% male; 89% female), pills (2%; n=2,336; 3% male; 97% female), other injectables (<1%; n=986; 100% female) and other LARC methods (<1%; n=136; 100% female). There was minimal variation in uptake of non-DMPA-SC methods across IPs.

The most common multiple method combination received by clients was DMPA-SC with male condoms (n=6,733 clients; 6% of all DMPA-SC recipients and 5% of all clients). There was considerable variation across states in the distribution of clients who received both DMPA-SC and male condoms. Of the 6,733 male condom and DMPA-SC recipients, 68% were in just three states: Cross River (n=950; 14% of total DMPA-SC plus male condom recipients; an AHI state); Abuja (n=2,407; 36%; PPFN); and Gombe (n=1,198; 18%; ARFH). This pattern was also observed across states with minimal DMPA-SC plus male condom combinations: Abia (n=254; 4% of total DMPA-SC plus male condom recipients; AHI); Kaduna (n=10; <1%; PPFN); Ebonyi (112; 2%; ARFH). Over half of all DMPA-SC clients in Abuja received DMPA-SC and male condoms together (62%; 2,407/3,902). In no other state was the percent of DMPA-SC clients who also received male condoms more than 10%. PPFN program managers reported that this finding was due to the practice of encouraging DMPA-SC recipients to use male condoms for the first week following their initial DMPA-SC injection. That explanation is supported by user category data in Abuja, where 86% (n=2,081/2,405) of DMPA-SC plus male condom recipients were new users, compared to 66% (n=2,578/3,898) as new users among all DMPA-SC recipients in the state. However, it was unclear from interviews with program mangers why the provision of multiple methods was so much more prevalent in particular states, even within those managed by the same IP.

New users and switchers

Among women clients reached by the UNFPA program, 80% (n=100,248) were new users of modern contraception, 15% (n=18,785) were repeat users of their previous method, and 5% (n=6,503) had previously used modern contraception but switched to a different method. Among women who switched modern methods, 96% (n=6,285) switched to DMPA-SC.

Discussion

In recent years, despite incremental increases in Nigeria’s mCPR (from 11.1% reported in the 2013 to 17.6% in 2018), unmet need has remained static (16.1% in 2013 and 16.6% in 2018)2,14. The introduction of DMPA-SC to Nigeria strengthens the country’s capacity to achieve national reproductive health goals. Program data from UNFPA’s 2016-2017, 10-state public sector DMPA-SC program suggest that using lower-tier health workers in a CBD model to deliver contraceptive services, including DMPA-SC, can reach substantial numbers of new users, especially among traditionally underserved populations. This may positively contribute to reducing unmet need and increasing overall mCPR. Though the depth of information on public sector users reached was limited due to standardized HMIS reporting, the systematic collection of individual, encounter-level data enabled closer evaluation of KPI performance across different implementation contexts (e.g. NGO partners and geographies). We compile these insights into three lessons learned regarding public sector contraceptive service provision including DMPA-SC in Nigeria.

  • (1) Adding DMPA-SC to Nigeria’s contraceptive method mix, in concert with delivery through CBD, may accelerate progress toward reducing unmet need.

UNFPA’s program delivered DMPA-SC to over 100,000 users in less than six months. The high percentage of DMPA-SC recipients who were new users of modern contraception (80%) suggests that unmet need remains high in Nigeria, particularly among women who use public sector services (e.g. lower-educated and less-wealthy women). The high percentage (92%; n=116,614) of women who selected DMPA-SC suggests DMPA-SC is an attractive addition to Nigeria’s the contraceptive method mix, particularly in the context of CBD. The percentage of new users among DMPA-SC recipients in Nigeria was higher than previous percentages reported in four countries with recent DMPA-SC pilots (range: 24–42%)15.

Additional research evaluating DMPA-SC’s launch in Nigeria has shown that user satisfaction from DMPA-SC was high (>90%)13. As the most common non-condom contraceptive product in Nigeria, injectable contraceptives are already in high demand2. DMPA-SC possesses traits that have been shown to be desirable among contraception users across sub-Saharan Africa: a smaller needle, less painful injections, fewer reported side effects, and the speed of administration16,17. These factors together echo the findings of research in Mozambique, which found that connecting injectable contraception to CBD is safe, effective, and a critical pathway to providing health services to communities lacking robust health infrastructure18. Combined, the evidence thus far makes a compelling case: DMPA-SC with CBD can reach underserved women, DMPA-SC popular among new users of modern contraception, and women are satisfied with DMPA-SC after use.

  • (2) Strategies that leverage past investments in SRH and public health infrastructure, such as those that find new roles for under-utilized health workers and previously-trained volunteers, can improve the overall effectiveness and cost-efficiency of CBD service delivery, though more examination of sustainability is needed.

CBD has a documented history as a safe and effective delivery strategy for contraception commodities, including injectables19,20. CBD systems expand the reach of traditional reproductive health systems in underserved contexts, particularly in areas where cultural barriers may restrict access to contraceptive services21,22. When women are limited in their ability to leave the home, new access modalities are required, and CBD outreach workers, often age and community peers of potential users, can overcome mobility barriers. Proactive outreach incorporates an element of demand-side generation into the reproductive health system that offers promise for future Nigerian contraception programs given structural and cultural barriers to care-seeking that many women can face.

Because some of the highest-performing states in the UNFPA program (on both an overall and per-provider number of clients reached) were those with previous implementation experience with CBD (e.g. Kebbi and Ebonyi), the data suggests that there is potentially an “infrastructure bonus,” where groundwork laid by previous programs leads to increased effectiveness for future implementation. CBD is a resource-intensive implementation strategy, but if the infrastructure bonus finding is valid, it suggests that initial investment in more expensive reproductive health programming could bear dividends in future cost-efficiency. Kaduna and Sokoto, two northern states with no previous CBD infrastructure, whose programs were administered by PPFN and ARFH, respectively, required high numbers of personnel to reach those users and both states yielded comparatively lower users reached on a per-provider basis. Future program planners will need to balance the clear benefits of CBD with the resource intensity of the implementation model, all informed by a realistic understanding of the existing and previous programming landscape in each state, and with perspective on the potential need for future programming.

Proactive CBD’s relatively higher costs (compared to traditional facility-based service delivery) may remain a barrier to rapid scale-up; similar sustainability concerns have arisen with other CBD-based contraception programs23. In Nigeria’s private sector, resource intensity led a promising CBD-based DMPA-SC program to its early termination6. While the volunteer cadres who worked on the public sector DMPA-SC program helped to ultimately reach clients, it remains unclear how these individuals would be retained over a longer time period. ARFH experimented with a small-scale microfinance scheme in Ebonyi where loans would be granted to market-based health workers, who would also receive training on rudimentary financial practices. However, despite some reported success with the scheme in Ebonyi, attributed by one program manager to the “progressive” nature of the state, the scheme failed to catch on in other states and by other IPs, and was viewed as operationally challenging to sustain, and it remains unknown to what extent microfinance-based financial incentives can contribute to provider retention and efficiency in the contraceptive market.

IPs were able to find some staffing efficiencies by finding volunteers who had previously been engaged in different health programs, reducing recruitment and training costs. Further engaging unemployed and under-employed CHEWs by ARFH also advanced the efficiency of service delivery by increasing the proportion of frontline workers trained and licensed to administer injections, rather than needing to refer interested clients to participating employed CHEWs for administration. More study is needed to identify best practices and pathways for increasing the sustainability of CBD.

  • (3) Additional strategies are needed to connect younger women to contraceptive services.

Connecting contraception to youth remains a persistent challenge across low- and middle-income countries23. Challenges in Nigeria include conservative cultural norms, pervasive misinformation about contraception, and bias against youth contraceptive use among providers4,24. In other DMPA-SC pilot countries, the percentage of DMPA-SC recipients under age 25 was approximately 44%) but in Nigeria the percentage was almost half of that (26%)15. Most DMPA-SC users reached by UNFPA’s program were older than the average contraception user in Nigeria; this finding is also consistent with private sector DMPA-SC program, which also reached low proportions of younger women6.

Recent research described the general ineffectiveness of many traditionally-lauded youth contraception program strategies, such as peer-to-peer outreach and the recruitment of age-peers, though one strategy identified as helpful for reaching youth is the recruitment and training of nonjudgmental and supportive providers25,26. Many UNFPA IPs leaned heavily on strategies like peer-to-peer outreach and the recruitment of youth personnel, one potential explanation for why the proportion of young women served was low.

AHI’s relative success in reaching higher proportions of younger women among UNFPA IPs suggests that some of their strategies may be worth considering in future programming: (a) using younger volunteers to conduct outreach in areas where younger people are (e.g. university campuses), (b) judicious selection of providers and screening for potential age bias, and (c) explicitly focusing programs on reaching young people.

It should be emphasized that many of these lessons learned were only possible because of a more robust internal program M&E system that collected individual-level end-user data for several KPIs. A recent review of the DMPA-SC landscape identified the need for research to disaggregate user data by age and prior contraception use so that researchers, programmers, and donors can to better understand DMPA-SC user profiles27. Delivering granular, client-level data was a challenge for the private sector introduction of DMPA-SC in Nigeria, as it is difficult to collect end-user data in the context of Nigeria’s private sector regulatory framework6. The data tools and collection mechanisms developed and used by the public sector DMPA-SC program entailed small adjustments to standardized government HMIS register forms. While the HMIS for contraceptive services has notable limitations—only a few client characteristics collected, encounters could not be linked to individual providers—the digitization of these records nonetheless enabled some disaggregated analyses. This electronic system, which collects user data from the ground up, may provide a valuable platform for future reproductive health program scaling in Nigeria.

Limitations

We must note several limitations to the findings presented in this paper. Though the data delivered by UNFPA provided a snapshot of end-user characteristics, some variables were incomplete and had missing observations (2% of age observations were missing; 4% of visit type observations). The short timeline of the program, made even shorter due to the product procurement delay, made it difficult to make inferences about longer trends over time. The user characteristics available were limited in scope; future studies would benefit from expanding user indicators to include information on marital status, parity, education, and wealth. Without data on the providers themselves, we were unable to assess the relationship between provider characteristics and contraceptive uptake. We were unable to conduct analysis on differential delivery by providers because this data was not systematically captured; providers were not universally linked to recorded service interactions. Programmatic activities were reported at the IP level, making it difficult to determine operational differences at the state level. It is important to note that no audit was conducted on informed choice protocols; high rates of DMPA-SC selection could thus be a byproduct of limited options presented by providers.

Conclusion

Our analysis of the Nigeria public sector DMPA-SC program suggests that the combination of DMPA-SC and proactive CBD can accelerate contraceptive uptake and reduce unmet need in Nigeria. Investment should continue in the CBD approach, along with future analysis to address concerns about the approach’s sustainability. There is potential for CBD and other reproductive health programs in the use of volunteer and other nontraditional health cadres (e.g. unemployed CHEWs). High demand for and satisfaction of DMPA-SC suggests that it can quickly become a normalized, effective component in Nigeria’s contraceptive method mix; a potential next step would be a transition towards user empowerment, autonomy, and self-injection15,28. And though overall uptake was high, more work is needed to connect younger users with contraception in Nigeria.

Data availability

Underlying data

Harvard Dataverse: Monitoring and evaluation data from the introduction of DMPA-SC in Nigeria's public and private sectors. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XCLNIS12

This project contains the following underling data:

  • UCSF DMPA-SC Dataverse

    • UNFPA data file guidance.docx (A guide and blueprint to the types and locations of all relevant data within the UNFPA data registry)

    • AHI_October_data_updated – deidentified.xlsx (Contains AHI data through Q3 2017)

    • Consolidated UNFPA KPI code 19Jun18.do (Stata do file for KPI analysis)

    • DMPA_SC-DATA_29082017 – deidentified.xlsx (Contains ARFH and PPFN data through Q3 2017)

    • October – December data – deidentified.xlsx (Contains program data for Q4 2017)

    • DMPA-SC Scale-up phone survey.dta (Contains UNFPA phone survey data)

Extended data

Harvard Dataverse: Monitoring and evaluation data from the introduction of DMPA-SC in Nigeria's public and private sectors. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XCLNIS12

This project contains the following extended data:

  • UCSF DMPA-SC Dataverse

    • Phone Survey.docx (Contains phone survey questionnaire)

    • DMPA-SC Scale-up phone survey codebook.xlsx (Contains phone survey codebook)

    • M&E Plan Scale-up Phase_2Dec2016_FINAL.pdf (Contains M&E plan for UNFPA phase of M&E)

    • DMPA-SC Scale-up in Nigeria_Final report_final draft_23May18.pdf (Contains final program report)

    • M&E Report 2016 Q4.docx (Contains Q4 2016 M&E report)

    • M&E report 2017 Q1-Q2.docx (Contains Q1 & Q2 2017 combined M&E report)

    • M&E report 2017 Q3.docx (Contains Q3 2017 M&E report)

    • M&E report 2017 Q4.docx (Contains Q4 2017 M&E report)

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 26 Jun 2019
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
Gates Open Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Schatzkin E, Afolabi K, Adedeji O et al. Lessons learned from a public sector community-based distribution program for scaling up DMPA-SC contraceptive services in Nigeria [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. Gates Open Res 2019, 3:1500 (https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13010.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 26 Jun 2019
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions

Are you a Gates-funded researcher?

If you are a previous or current Gates grant holder, sign up for information about developments, publishing and publications from Gates Open Research.

You must provide your first name
You must provide your last name
You must provide a valid email address
You must provide an institution.

Thank you!

We'll keep you updated on any major new updates to Gates Open Research

Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.